|Author:||afdave1 [ Mon Jul 30, 2007 7:23 am ]|
|Post subject:||Re: Formal Debate: Dendrochronology and C14?|
THIS IS A DEBATE ABOUT DENDROCHRONOLOGY … I NEED TO SEE TREE RINGS
Maybe I have not been clear enough. Maybe my last request was vague. I see that I asked for “raw data” but I should have reiterated what I have said previously, thus what I meant by “raw data.” What I meant was TREE RINGS.
I really, really want to see tree rings. What would be great would be to see the rings from the bottom 3 specimens in the graphic above, plus the long specimen that spans from ~2500BC to ~800AD. It is my opinion that these 3 (and others) are misplaced (should not be in the 6000-7000 ybp range) and could easily be matched up with rings of trees in the <5000 ybp range. My opinion is that the Flood occurred about ~5000 ybp and that the 3 “old” specimens above were placed where they were because of C14 dating. But this in turn is based on unwarranted assumptions which make them appear much older than they really are.
Please note from your own post …
… that VISUAL INSPECTION is important.
I have been saying this from the beginning of this debate.
This is not a case of me not wanting to bother to educate myself.
This is a case of many posters here, including you, asserting that you understand the “science” of dendrochronology. I have asserted that most of you (maybe all of you) do not. So this debate is your chance to prove me wrong. It is your chance to demonstrate to me that you HAVE actually observed these tree rings. And you have verified for yourself the soundness of conclusions like Ferguson’s.
I am beginning to think that you have NOT seen Ferguson’s tree rings and that possibly this is first time you have ever gotten this close to the data. Am I right?
In any case, if you want to continue this debate, please provide pictures of Ferguson’s tree rings … the ones specified above … that way, we can all inspect them together.
1) If I find that the scientific against is against Christianity, then yes, I will give up Christianity. I am not interested in believing things for which there is no evidence. But the longer I spend on skeptic forums, the more evidence I find which supports Christianity.
- Moderator’s Introduction
- BWE’s 1st Post
- Dave’s 1st Post
- BWE’s 2nd Post
- Dave’s 2nd Post
- BWE’s 3rd Post
- Dave’s 3rd post
- BWE’s 4th Post
- Dave’s 4th Post
- BWE’s 5th Post
- Dave’s 5th Post
- BWE’s 6th Post
- Dave’s 6th Post
- BWE’s 7th Post
- Dave’s 7th post
- BWE’s 8th Post
- Dave’s 8th Post
- BWE’s Penultimate Post
- Dave’s Penultimate Post
- BWE’s Final Debate Post